Is not the content itself the set of thoughts

Joita97009

The above regulations clearly stipulate that only expressions, not ideas, etc., can be protected. Therefore, under copyright law, what is protected is the specific expression of a work, not the idea behind its creation. So what is "expression"? Under copyright law, in particular the previously mentioned artistic clauses. Containing the section on the legal definition of a work, it can be argued that the Act does not contain any restrictions on the manner in which a work can be expressed.

Therefore, any expression is allowed, but its form must be concrete, repeatable, and thus objectified to some extent. Continuing with the discussion of the meaning of the concept of method of expression of a work, it should be noted that it is nothing but the form in which the philippines photo editor work is conveyed to the recipient. The work may be presented using text, sketches, drawings, symbols, music or photographs. The literature correctly states that the work and ideas , but the content expressed in some form.



The purpose of which is to make the given content accessible to the consciousness of others, or for the creator to copy a set for himself The possibility of a given thought or idea. Thus, although copyright provisions exclude general ideas from legal protection, the literature discusses exceptions to this rule—if an idea takes the form of a personalized expression, it ceases to be just an idea and becomes a work. In order for an idea to be copyrightable.